Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

5 results found

  1. 1,410 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  Feedback  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    @Max - Looks like there's a Github submission for RCS-e: https://github.com/android-rcs/rcsjta

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Totally agree on this, but need to clarify this for the average Joe/Jane. It's basically SMS/MMS on steroids....

    RCS is a standardized protocol similar to iMessage (or WhatsApp/FB Messenger/etc) across a growing number of carriers & nations. It's now officially adopted by Sprint and signs of T-Mobile and AT&T in the near future. If/When this standard is adopted across most or all carriers, it will wipe out the exclusivity and issues associated with proprietary services like iMessage.

    A nice article: https://www.wired.com/2017/02/google-support-for-rcs/

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,218 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Feedback  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This is standard in every text app I've ever used. Was surprised when I didn't see it with Textra. Most apps either have them above/below each other or on more info when selecting a message.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 134 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Feedback  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hands down agree. I really like the time delay, has saved me a number of times, BUT it's also kind of a waste of a feature when you can't keep typing the next message or approve/send the message ahead of time.

    What I would like to see...One or both:
    +Delayed message pops into the body, where a user can continue to type next message.
    +Option to press the message to instantly send it, whether delayed in body or message box (i.e. you've reviewed, it looks good, click, and send).

    This allows someone to have normal conversations without having to wait however many seconds in between every message. Otherwise...why not just make the habit of checking the message before sending?

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 3,293 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    50 comments  ·  Feedback  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 5,797 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    123 comments  ·  Feedback  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base